I’m often asked about preparation of remedies for dosing, especially in connection with use of LM potencies. I’ve quoted David Little’s article on Solutions Large and Small below in full. You can read the original here. David also describes the experiments he carried out.
Solutions Large and Small
Preparation of the Medicinal Solution
The question of how to make a medicinal solution has been raised. Our research group uses the Hahnemannian Standard as discussed in The Chronic Diseases and The 6th Organon of the Healing Arts. The reason for this is twofold. Continue reading
just another IKEA philosophy statement…
As I think people reading this blog are aware, I have no patience with those who relegate the Organon the status of philosophy, and thus consigning it to dusty shelves rather than using it as a manual of practice. It’s a bit like calling the instruction leaflet you get with your IKEA kitchen / bookshelf / cupboard “the IKEA philosophy statement”, and not referring to it when you try to build the darn thing.
This article was prompted by a discussion with a colleague regarding an old post of mine, entitled “What We Know and What We don’t Know”. Our discussion took us into the subject covered by Dr. Gary Weaver’s original post, on “The Realities of Practice”. In his article, amongst other things Gary set out a prescribing process for a busy clinic where 40-100 patients may be seen a day by splitting up case-taking between one prescriber and two or three nurses or advanced students. The main symptoms of the case are elicited by the prescriber’s assistants. The patient is then brought to the prescriber for further questioning, analysis and prescription. This kind of clinic is more common in India, and much less common elsewhere. Many, if not most of us work privately with patients, and I don’t know if any such volume clinics exist in the West.
The point, however, is that clear symptoms may be taken by the assistants within 20 minutes, and that deeper investigation and analysis should not take the prescriber longer than a further half an hour, often much less. Continue reading
No, this is not an advert…
On Idiosyncracy, provings and Campbell’s soup.
I was working with a nutritionist a long time ago, and our conversation turned to a recent scandal about food-poisoning from Campbell’s soup. There had been an uproar at the time, and the company countered with a statement that the risk was only one in ten thousand. “That’s all very well,” countered the nutritionist, “but it doesn’t help if you’re the one…” Continue reading
This is a new project – opinions please…
(and for the observant, there are at least two misread words…, I know…)
warning: this post may make you think…
I have seen so many queries on the internet about the best school to study homoeopathy. About the costs of effective foundation courses. But if someone sincerely wants to study and afterwards practice homoeopathy – their best initial option for true foundation studies is to avoid the schools altogether.
So what’s the cheapest and most effective way to study homoeopathy? Continue reading
The Chronic Diseases provings are annotated by Richard Hughes. Many of the notes relate to Hughes’ view of Hahnemann’s work and methodology. Should we accept Hughes’ notes at face value? Take them with a grain of salt? Ignore them altogether? Continue reading